Showing posts with label seroquel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label seroquel. Show all posts

Thursday, June 14, 2012

AstraZeneca - Seroquel - Army Apologizes for Seroquel Death

From the ArmyTimes

DoD cracks down on off-label drug use


By Patricia Kime - Staff writer
Posted : Thursday Jun 14, 2012 10:01:04 EDT
A letter landed in Stan White’s mailbox in Cross Lanes, W.Va., in April.
It began: “On behalf of the men and women of the U.S. Armed Forces … I extend my sincerest and deepest sympathy for the loss of your sons.”

But the note wasn’t simply a condolence. The message from Air Force Lt. Gen. Brooks Bash informed White that U.S. Central Command had decided in March to remove the powerful antipsychotic drug Seroquel from its approved formulary list.

Under the new rules, CENTCOM doctors now must request a waiver if they write a prescription for Seroquel, also known as quetiapine.

The change is a small victory for White, who had already lost one son to combat and has sought restrictions on the drug he believes contributed to the death of a younger son.

Marine Cpl. Andrew White died Feb. 12, 2008, at age 23 from a lethal combination of medications prescribed for post-traumatic stress disorder, mainly clonazepam, quetiapine and paroxetine — the latter two known to sometimes affect the heart’s regular rhythm.

“I have never been one to say I’m opposed to medication — I’m just opposed to these medications, which have a side effect of causing cardiac arrest,” White said June 6.

Off-label use soars

Prescriptions for Seroquel have exploded in the past decade, especially in the armed forces, where it often is prescribed off-label as a sleep aid.

In 2003, service members were diagnosed with insomnia at a rate of 30 per 10,000; by 2009, the rate had risen to 226 per 10,000. Prescriptions for Seroquel, or quetiapine, have subsequently soared, multiplying 27-fold in the same time period.

The drug is known to cause drowsiness and chase away nightmares associated with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Navy Capt. Mike Colston of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs said medications become popular as providers learn about them and as they receive new approvals for use by the Food and Drug Administration — in the case of quetiapine, as an add-on therapy for antidepressants.
Yet questions have been raised over whether its off-label use for insomnia was more than a grass-roots movement by physicians. In April 2010, manufacturer Astra-Zeneca agreed to pay $520 million to the federal government to settle a civil suit alleging that it illegally marketed Seroquel for a host of off-label uses such as Alzheimer’s disease, anxiety, PTSD and sleeplessness.

According to The Associated Press, in 2009, the Pentagon spent $8.6 million on the drug, while the Veterans Affairs Department spent $125.4 million.

Recent moves by the Pentagon to restrict prescriptions for atypical antipsychotic drugs were the result of a search for safe, proven therapies for troops, Colston said.

“We aim to … discourage the use of off-label medication treatments with antipsychotic medications before established evidence-based strategies have been implemented,” he said.

Earlier this year, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Dr. Jonathan Woodson asked the military services to monitor prescriptions for atypical antipsychotic medications, a class of drugs that includes quetiapine.
The medications are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. But in the past decade, their popularity has soared for off-label use, including for treating PTSD and insomnia.

A 2011 study of 692 patients prescribed quetiapine at Madigan Army Medical Center, Wash., showed just 9.4 percent received it for an FDA-approved use, while 57 percent received it for insomnia.
In 2011, the services issued 54,581 prescriptions for Seroquel alone, the most for any antipsychotic medication — more than 2.5 times the number of prescriptions for the second-most prescribed atypical antipsychotic, Abilify, and nearly four times the number for risperidone, according to information obtained by a Military Times under a Freedom of Information Act request.

A growing alarm

Quetiapine has the strongest somnolent effect of all atypical antipsychotics, and is commonly prescribed troops for relieving nightmares.

But as its popularity has grown, evidence has mounted pointing to links between atypical antipsychotics and irregular heartbeat and even death — prompting critics and physicians, including Woodson, to sound the alarm on frequent prescriptions.

“Providers should use caution when these agents are used as sleep aids in service members struggling with substance use disorders, especially given the risk of such side effects as glucose dysregulation and cardiac effects,” Woodson wrote Feb. 22.

A study in the January 2009 New England Journal of Medicine found the rate of sudden cardiac death doubled for those taking atypical antipsychotic drugs, and there were three such deaths per year for every 1,000 patients taking the medication.

The risk of a fatal heart event also increased with dosage, and study author and Vanderbilt University researcher Wayne Ray said mixing these medications with others that cause irregular heartbeat, known medically as QT prolongation, could worsen the issue and possibly cause death.

“We saw this strong relationship between the antipsychotics and sudden death … and all the information we had pointed to the drugs as the cause,” Ray said after the study was published. “Our findings … would suggest avoiding other medications that prolong QT whenever possible because when you give two together, you’re … increasing the patient’s risk.”

The Madigan study, conducted by Army Lt. Col. Vincent Mysliwiec and presented last June at a meeting of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, showed that of 692 patients who took quetiapine, 126 were monitored for heart arrhythmia within six months of starting on the drug, and of those, 11 showed an abnormal heart rhythm.

Ten of those cases were directly attributed to quetiapine; when the medication was stopped, their heart rhythm returned to normal, according to Psychiatric News.

Through an Army spokesman, Mysliwiec declined to release the study but said it was available to Defense Department physicians on request.

A 2008 Dutch study also showed patients taking more than one QT-interval-prolonging drug had 4.8 times the risk of cardiac arrest.

‘He just died’

White attributes his son’s death, and those of at least three others from West Virginia — Army Pfc. Derick Johnson, 22; Army National Guard Sgt. Eric Layne, 29; and Marine Cpl. Nicholas Endicott, 24 — to at least two heart-rhythm-altering drugs, quetiapine and paroxetine.

Since their cases were publicized, others have stepped forward, including Alicia McElroy, whose husband, Army National Guard Staff Sgt. James McElroy, 30, was found dead in his barracks while receiving treatment for PTSD at Fort Benning, Ga.

She said that among his many medications were Paxil, Seroquel and Klonopin.
“This wasn’t a long, slow death. It wasn’t an overdose. He wasn’t found unconscious. He just died,” said Alicia McElroy, who is still awaiting autopsy results. Her husband died June 6, 2011.

Seroquel maker AstraZeneca stands behind the safety record of its medication, which it made exclusively until March 2012, when the patent expired.

“Patient safety is a priority for AstraZeneca, and we think Seroquel is safe and effective when it’s used as recommended,” Stephanie Andrzejewski said.

She added the company does not condone prescribing Seroquel for off-label uses.
“We trust doctors to use medical judgment in … determining when it is appropriate to prescribe medications,” she said.

In July 2011, the FDA required AstraZeneca to add a warning to the drug’s label regarding its potential cardiac risk.

The services take action

The service surgeons general have responded to Woodson’s request for their policy guidance on atypical antipsychotics, Defense Department spokesman Navy Capt. Michael Colston said June 4. According to documents released by Colston:

• The Army decided risperidone should not be prescribed because its risks outweigh its benefits, and providers who prescribe other such drugs, including quetiapine, “must clearly document their rationale” and receive informed consent from the patient.

• The Navy Department agreed to monitor providers and flag those who prescribe the most atypical antipsychotics off-label for additional review.

• The Air Force, which prescribes atypical antipsychotics to “fewer than 0.15 percent of airmen,” will review provider prescribing practices and counsel those who show a pattern.

• The Washington, D.C., area medical command will conduct periodic evaluations of drugs prescribed to patients with PTSD and follow-up evaluations to see whether further monitoring is needed.

White, who had another son, Army Sgt. Robert White, killed in combat, said he is glad the military is moving away from medications for PTSD.

“I know people who have died from medication,” he said. “I don’t know anyone who’s ever been killed by counseling.”

Staff writer Andrew Tilghman contributed to this report.

---------------------------------------------

for further reading on this topic Pharmalot has written a related article 

The US Military And Off-Label Antipsychotic Use

By Ed Silverman // June 14th, 2012
 
But growing concern over links between antipsychotics – especially Seroquel, which is the most widely prescribed antipscyhotic by the US military – and irregular heartbeats is prompting moves to restrict usage. For instance, a retrospective review of 692 patients who were prescribed Seroquel at the Madigan Army Medical Center in 2007 and 2008 found that only 3.4 percent received the drug for an approved use, which would also include adjunct treatment for depression.

However, 60 percent received the drug for insomnia, 19 percent for anxiety, 12 percent for mood disorders and 8 percent for post-traumatic stress disorder. Yet, only 18 percent were screened for irregular heartbeats and 126 underwent an EKG, with 11 percent showing abnormal heart rhythms, according to a presentation at the American Academy of Sleep Medicine annual meeting (here is the presentation – see page A179).

Such findings underscore the concerns. Last year, the armed services issued 54,581 prescriptions for Seroquel alone, the most for any antipsychotic — and more than 2.5 times the number of prescriptions for the second-most prescribed atypical antipsychotic, Abilify, and nearly four times the number for Risperdal, according to information obtained by Military Times under a Freedom of Information Act request.

In 2003, Military Times reports, service members were diagnosed with insomnia at a rate of 30 per 10,000. By 2009, the rate had jumped to 226 per 10,000. Prescriptions for Seroquel rose 27-fold in the same time period. And according to The Associated Press, in 2009, the Pentagon spent $8.6 million on the drug, while the Veterans Affairs Department spent $125.4 million. That same year, results of a proof-of-concept study showed Seroquel benefited patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (see this and this).

Meanwhile, a 2008 study in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology showed patients taking more than one drug that can cause irregular heartbeats had 4.8 times the risk of cardiac arrest (look here). A study the following year in The New England Journal of Medicine found the rate of sudden cardiac death doubled for those taking atypical antipsychotics, and there were three such deaths each year for every 1,000 patients taking such a drug (here is the abstract). The risk of a fatal heart event also increased with dosage, the Military Times notes.

Moreover, mixing antipsychotics with others that cause irregular heartbeat, known medically as QT prolongation, could cause more harm and, possibly, death.

**read full article at the link provided above**

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

AstraZeneca (Seroquel) CEO David Brennan sees huge pay jump - HOW CRIME PAYS QUITE HANDSOMELY

AstraZeneca (Seroquel) CEO David Brennan sees pay jump to £9.1m - HOW CORPORATE CRIME PAYS QUITE HANDSOMELY


As countless injured Seroquel litigants are now being pushing & dumped into the streets by unscrupulous ambulance chaser law firms (many of those will cont. to suffer on in abject poverty without ever seeing the slightest shred of justice unto their death); And even after those DOJ (Department of Justice) fines, the massive health damage inflicted upon the general public, the ever growing volumes of documented corp crimes: AstraZeneca Chief David Brennan sees pay jump to £9.1m.

That's right folks, in that other select members only  (TO BIG TO HOLD ACCOUNTABLE) world of corporate crime, pay offs, political wrangling, billion dollar legal teams, and the untold billions in ill gotten profits... CRIME PAYS....& it PAYS OFF BIG TIME

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From The Telegraph UK

AstraZeneca chief David Brennan sees pay jump to £9.1m

AstraZeneca chief executive David Brennan saw his total pay climb to more than £9.1m in 2011, after an increased payout from a share award which vested last year.

AstraZeneca chief David Brennan sees pay jump to £9.1m
Mr Brennan's 2008 share award also vested last year, with a value of £5.8m, the annual report shows. Photo: PA
 
The pay hike happened despite concern about Astra's pipeline of new drugs, as it faces a looming "patent cliff", with several of its best-selling medicines losing exclusivity and facing competition from cheaper generic versions in the next few years.

Last week, the company had to pull the plug on an anti-depressant it was developing, incurring a $50m (£31.3m) charge, and in February announced 7,000 job cuts to save money.

Mr Brennan's base pay rose 2.5pc to £997,223 in 2011, and including a bonus and other payments, was up 11pc to £3.37m, according to the pharma company's annual report.

His 2008 share award also vested last year, with a value of £5.8m, the annual report shows.
The size of the share award was increased by 25pc by the board, after Astra came top of its peer group between 2008 and 2010.


Mr Brennan turned down any increase in his base pay for 2012, the report shows.

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Busted in Louisiana: For attempting to sell AstraZeneca's Seroquel,and possession of Seroquel and marijuana

Prescription drug street sales attempt of antipsychotic Seroquel

NEWS: Monroe, Louisiana
Monroe police arrested a man Monday evening accused of drug possession near a child.
Glenn Armstrong, 19, of 1702 Railroad Ave., Monroe, was booked into Ouachita Correctional Center on charges of possession of Seroquel, possession of marijuana, possession of controlled and dangerous substances in the presence of juveniles, stop sign violation, no driver's license and no insurance.
An arrest affidavit stated an officer was traveling westbound on Texas Avenue when he saw the driver of a Mazda vehicle run a red traffic light at the intersection with South Second Street. Police said the driver, later identified as Armstrong, stopped in the 500 block of South First Street.During the traffic stop, police said Armstrong could not show them a proper driver's license or proof of insurance. Police said Armstrong appeared to be nervous.
The report stated police saw two 16-year-old juveniles in Armstrong's vehicle. A search of the vehicle revealed a bottle of suspected Seroquel pills and a small bag of suspected marijuana. The unnamed juveniles told police Armstrong had been trying to sell the suspected pills before he was stopped.
Bond was $16,050.


MPD accuses suspect of having drugs near child

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And also in the news....an article that can be placed in the category of doing much too little, far too late....

State puts lid on overprescribing doctors


Pennsylvania has investigated and removed some doctors who were among the top prescribers of painkillers and mental health drugs for Medicaid patients, officials said in a letter made public on Friday.

Five doctors were disqualified from participating in the program; four had their licenses suspended; two were referred to prosecutors for review; and one is under investigation, the state Department of Public Welfare told U.S. Senate investigators.

The state reported its actions in a Feb. 27 letter to Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, who has been investigating abuses nationwide of medicines such as the anti-depressant Xanax. Pennsylvania initially provided information about the top 10 prescribers of eight antipsychotic, painkiller or anti-anxiety drugs to Grassley in 2010.

"We are seeing that certain states, including Pennsylvania, are reporting that they or the state medical board has taken action against medical providers, and that's good news," said Jill Gerber, Grassley's spokeswoman.

The state welfare department said it sent intervention letters to 51 other doctors, showing their patients' drug histories. The state said its program encourages doctors to discontinue unnecessary prescriptions, reduce drug quantities or switch to other treatments.
State officials declined to identify any doctors.

"Our administration is dedicated to rooting out all waste, abuse and fraud in our programs and services," spokeswoman Donna Kirker Morgan said in a statement.

"Although the senator's questions are an interesting snapshot of antipsychotic drug utilization in the Medicaid system, the questions do not delve into important facts and backgrounds about patients and their current needs for such drugs and the circumstances for such prescriptions."

Top prescribers continue to dispense many of the drugs at a high cost for taxpayers, the state's response shows. Along with its letter, public welfare reported the top 10 prescribers for eight drugs, showing the number of prescriptions each doctor wrote and the dollar value of them.
One doctor last year gave out 6,950 prescriptions for Xanax — or more than 19 every day — at a cost of nearly $70,500. The year before, another doctor wrote 1,864 prescriptions for Seroquel, an antidepression and schizophrenia drug that can cost up to $12 per tablet. The Seroquel prescriptions cost taxpayers more than $1 million.

The state attorney general's office could not immediately provide details about whether any of the public welfare referrals resulted in prosecution. "We aggressively pursue provider fraud, which diverts limited taxpayer resources from Medicaid recipients with legitimate needs," spokesman Nils Hagen-Frederiksen said.

The state's response to Grassley was made public yesterday when the agency responded to a Right-to-Know Request filed by Ken Kramer, an investigator for Citizens Commission on Human Rights International, a group that investigates and exposes psychiatric abuse.

"It's very good to see Pennsylvania taking action," Kramer, 55, of Clearwater, Fla., said in an email to the Tribune-Review. "There is no debate on this: Patients are overdrugged, Medicaid is overbilled and taxpayers are overburdened -- all caused by the bogus prescribing of psychiatrists."

--------------------------------------------------------------------

So everyone is absolutely clear and to correct a blatant mistake often reported by media. Seroquel is not an anti-depressant drug...it is a powerful neuroleptic drug (anti-psychotic). 
neuroleptic drug - tranquilizer used to treat psychotic conditions when a calming effect is desired

Friday, January 27, 2012

Ohio doctor wrote nine AstraZeneca Seroquel prescriptions per hour . Senator targeting big prescribers

. 
From Propublica

Senate Watchdog Targets High-Prescribing Medicaid Docs

by Charles Ornstein and Tracy Weber
ProPublica, Jan. 24, 2012, 2:04 p.m.
 
An influential U.S. senator is grilling officials in nearly three-dozen states, demanding to know how they are cracking down on physicians who prescribe massive amounts of potentially dangerous prescription drugs.

Iowa Republican Charles Grassley sent letters to 34 states Monday asking what steps they had taken to investigate doctors whose prescribing of antipsychotics, anti-anxiety drugs and painkillers to Medicaid patients far exceeds that of their peers.
The request is a follow-up to a 2010 letter Grassley sent all states that requested statistics on top prescribers of these drugs.

“These types of drugs have addictive properties, and the potential for fraud and abuse by prescribers and patients is extremely high,” Grassley wrote in Monday’s letters. “When these drugs are prescribed to Medicaid patients, it is the American people who pay the price for over-prescription, abuse, and fraud.”

ProPublica reported in November that Florida allowed at least three physicians to keep treating and prescribing drugs to the poor amid clear signs of possible misconduct. One doctor kept prescribing narcotic pain pills to Medicaid patients for more than a year after he was arrested and charged in 2010 with trafficking in them.

A number of the top-prescribing Medicaid doctors around the country are listed in our Dollars for Docs database of payments made by 12 pharmaceutical companies to physicians for speaking and consulting Medicaid, jointly funded by the states and federal government, provides health care coverage to about 60 million low-income enrollees.

Grassley, the senior Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, has long argued for greater transparency in health care. The painkillers and mental health drugs Grassley is inquiring about are among the top drivers of Medicaid drug spending.

His letter to Ohio notes that the top prescriber of the anti-psychotic Abilify wrote 13,825 prescriptions in 2009 — about 54 prescriptions per weekday. Ohio paid $6.7 million for that those prescriptions, state officials reported to Grassley.

The biggest prescriber of another anti-psychotic, Seroquel, wrote 18,890 scripts at a cost of $5.7 million. Grassley wrote the tally would amount to nine prescriptions per hour. When Ohio submitted the data to Grassley last year, it did not identify the doctors by name or license number.

“After an extensive review of prescribing habits of the serial prescribers of pain and mental-health drugs in Ohio, I have concerns about the oversight and enforcement of Medicaid abuse in your state,” he wrote. “While I am sensitive to the concerns of misinterpretation of the data you provided, the numbers themselves are quite shocking.”

Grassley’s letter to Maine cites a physician who wrote 1,867 prescriptions for the powerful painkiller OxyContin in 2009, nearly double the second-highest prescriber. The doctor also wrote 1,723 prescriptions for another painkiller, Roxicodone, nearly three times as many as the next highest prescriber.


Calls to officials in Ohio and Maine have not been returned.

In his letters to the 34 states, Grassley asked that officials tell him by Feb. 13 what action, if any, they have taken against top prescribers, whether those doctors are still eligible to bill Medicaid, whether any of the doctors were referred to their state medical boards for investigation, and what systems have been set up to track possibly excessive prescribing, among others.

Grassley is sending letters to 12 other states that never provided him data, as requested, on their top Medicaid prescribers. Four other states will not receive follow-up letters because the senator felt their initial responses to his 2010 letter were adequate.


ProPublica reported in November that since Grassley’s initial letter requesting the data in 2010, Louisiana, Arizona, Oklahoma and New York have kicked some high-prescribing physicians out of Medicaid. California has temporarily suspended or placed restrictions on 15 to 20 doctors in the past two years for prescribing disproportionately high volumes of painkillers and antipsychotics to Medicaid patients.

But Grassley said more needs to be done.

“When a doctor writes more prescriptions than seems humanly possible, it makes sense to ask questions,” he said in a statement to ProPublica. The statement noted that some states never responded to his original letter in 2010.

“If state and federal taxpayers are being cheated because of inappropriate prescriptions,” Grassley said, “the state and federal governments have to get to the bottom of it and stop it.”

Friday, January 6, 2012

AstraZeneca Seroquel - More evidence tying Seroquel use to the development of Diabetes and related conditions

AstraZeneca Seroquel - More evidence tying Seroquel use to the development of Diabetes and related conditions

 A new abstract has been published once again showing the direct correlation between the use of anti-psychotic drugs and the onset of diabetes & related conditions (causation). Of course, we know from some of the very limited public release of AstraZeneca internal documents related to the Seroquel litigation; that AstraZeneca was well aware of these inherent adverse health risks related to Seroquel long ago ( background here astrazeneca-suppressed-drug-test-data ) , but instead of conducting further investigation and studies into these damaging and deadly relevant risk factors; they chose to bury the adverse data instead, and then turn Seroquel over to their marketing/sales department to make it the multi-billion dollar a year block buster it eventually became. 

In fact, the main hang up that has been so publicly touted in the Seroquel Litigation is that the plaintiff law firms haven't provided accepted expert medical testimony that Seroquel is a leading contributor to the onset of diabetes and related conditions to the court. That appears to be no longer a significant problem considering the new dear doctor letter  and studies showing the connection conclusively.

Studies have already shown that atypical anti-psychotics (Seroquel) have a much higher risk for metabolic disorders than the older anti-psychotics drugs (abstract of study here -> Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs and Diabetes Mellitus in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Database : Conclusions: In the AERS database, lower associations with DRAEs were seen for haloperidol, aripiprazole and ziprasidone, and higher associations were seen for olanzapine, risperidone, clozapine and quetiapine. Our findings support differential risk of diabetes across atypical anti-psychotics, reinforcing the need for metabolic monitoring of patients taking anti-psychotics.)

Yet, this newest study that isn't even differentiating between older anti-psychotics and the newer atypical anti-psychotics is showing a more significant correlation between the use of these drugs and the onset or development of diabetes and related conditions. ( you can reasonably imagine if they had only conducted this study using a-typical anti-psychotic drugs, the prevalence numbers would be much higher than are being portrayed in the abstract below) . This is vitally important health information that has been buried for far to long from the public and users of these drugs. 

The evidence is now showing that no longer can greedy pharmaceutical giants like AstraZeneca hide the reality of what they have done. There is no longer any doubt that they placed profits before patient safety in one of the most detestable crimes of our times. No more excuses, injured parties demand trials, they demand no more hidden secrets, no more backroom pay to play deals...the injured parties and the public have a right to know, & they have a right to justice.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From The Journal Of Clinical Psychiatry

Prediabetes in Patients Treated With Antipsychotic Drugs
[Abstract] [Full Text] Posted 12/27/11


 Prediabetes in Patients Treated With Antipsychotic Drugs

Prediabetes in Patients Treated With Antipsychotic Drugs
J Clin Psychiatry
10.4088/JCP.10m06822
Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
 Background: In 2010, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) proposed that individuals with fasting glucose level of   100–125 mg/dL (5.6–6.9 mmol/L) or glucose level of 140–199 mg/dL (7.8–11.0 mmol/L) 2 hours after a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test or hemoglobin A1c 5.7%–6.4% be classified as prediabetic, indicating increased risk for the emergence of diabetes mellitus. At the same time, the ADA formulated guidelines for the use of metformin for the treatment of prediabetes.
Objective: To determine the prevalence of prediabetes in a cohort of psychiatrically ill adults receiving antipsychotics and to compare the clinical and metabolic features of prediabetic patients with those of patients with normal glucose tolerance and those with diabetes mellitus.
Method: The 2010 ADA criteria were applied to a large, consecutive, single-site European cohort of 783 adult psychiatric inpatients (mean age: 37.6 years) without a history of diabetes who were receiving antipsychotics. All patients in this cross-sectional study underwent measurement of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, oral glucose tolerance test, and fasting insulin and lipids from November 2003 through July 2007.
Results: 413 patients (52.8%) had normal glucose tolerance, 290 (37.0%) had prediabetes, and 80 (10.2%) had diabetes mellitus. The fasting glucose and/or hemoglobin A1c criteria were met by 89.7% of prediabetic patients. A statistically significant intergroup gradient from normal glucose tolerance to prediabetes and from prediabetes to diabetes mellitus was observed for waist circumference, triglycerides, fasting insulin levels, and frequency of metabolic syndrome (P = .02 to P < .0001). Only 19/290 prediabetic patients (6.6%) met the 2010 ADA criteria for treatment with metformin.
Conclusions: Prediabetes is highly prevalent in adults treated with antipsychotic drugs and correlates with markers of increased intraabdominal adiposity, enhanced lipolysis, and insulin resistance. Criteria for using metformin to prevent the emergence of diabetes mellitus may need to be revised for this population.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                         Or we can continue to do nothing...allow corporate greed to go unchecked, and have our population do the above instead

Thursday, January 5, 2012

AstraZeneca Seroquel - NEW DEAR DOCTOR WARNING LETTER - Dec. 2011 - but wasn't their litigation defense based on their claim that Seroquel doesn't cause diabetes?


AstraZeneca Seroquel - NEW DEAR DOCTOR WARNING LETTER - Dec. 2011 - but wasn't AstraZeneca's litigation defense based on their dubious claim that Seroquel doesn't cause diabetes?

 From the MHRA gov.uk.

 Seroquel (quietapine) - 23 December 2011
 Information on weight gain, hyperglycaemia, and metabolic riskPDF file (opens in new window) (208Kb)

Dear Doctor

Re: quetiapine and quetiapine prolonged release Summary Product Characteristics update
We are continuously monitoring the safety of our products and the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) is updated frequently to accommodate the most up to date information regarding our products. Section 4.4 Special Warnings and Precautions of the quetiapine and quetiapine prolonged release SmPCs was updated recently to reflect the most up to date information on weight gain, hyperglycaemia and metabolic risk.

In agreement with the MHRA, AstraZeneca is providing the following information to prescribers to highlight the labelling text relating to metabolic parameters. We have also added a citation for guidelines on how to monitor patients that are taking atypical antipsychotics in line with good practice as recommended by MHRA.

Update to information in the “Special warnings and precautions” section of the label on weight gain, hyperglycaemia and metabolic risk:

Weight:
Weight gain has been reported in patients who have been treated with quetiapine, and should be monitored and managed as clinically appropriate as in accordance with utilised antipsychotic guidelines*.

Hyperglycaemia:
Hyperglycaemia and/or development or exacerbation of diabetes occasionally associated with ketoacidosis or coma has been reported rarely, including some fatal cases (see section 4.8). In some cases, a prior increase in body weight has been reported which may be a predisposing factor. Appropriate clinical monitoring is advisable in accordance with utilised antipsychotic guidelines. Patients treated with any antipsychotic agent including quetiapine, should be observed for signs and symptoms of hyperglycaemia, (such as polydipsia, polyuria, polyphagia and weakness) and patients with diabetes mellitus or with risk factors for diabetes mellitus should be monitored regularly for worsening of glucose control. Weight should be monitored regularly.

Metabolic Risk:
Given the observed changes in weight, blood glucose (see hyperglycemia) and lipids seen in clinical studies, there may be possible worsening of the metabolic risk profile in individual patients, which should be managed as clinically appropriate.

Reg Office AstraZeneca UK Limited,
2 Kingdom Street, London, W2 6BD,
Reg No 03674842
AstraZeneca UK Limited is a subsidiary
company of AstraZeneca PLC
DOP: November 2011 545607 - 1551204

Existing information on other metabolic parameters include the following:

Lipids:
Increases in triglycerides, LDL and total cholesterol, and decreases in HDL cholesterol have been observed in clinical trials with quetiapine. Lipid changes should be managed as clinically appropriate.
Please see Section 4.4 of the SmPC “Special warnings and precaution for use” for further details.
*Antipsychotic guidelines relevant to UK include the following. Prescribers are encouraged to check for updates to relevant guidelines on a regular basis.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Core intervention in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in primary and secondary care (update). Clinical guideline 82. 2009
Should you have any questions regarding the above information please contact our Medical Information Department on 01582 836836.

Yours faithfully,
Catriona McMahon BSc MBChB FRCA MFPM
Medical & Regulatory Affairs Director
AstraZeneca UK Marketing Company

-------------------------------------------
Somehow this newest dear doctor warning letter doesn't quite jive with what AstraZeneca was actually doing & claiming while feverishly promoting the drug Seroquel


 From the highly regarded 1boringoldman blog

Drugmaker Paid Psychiatrist Nearly $500,000 to Promote Antipsychotic, Despite Doubts About Research
Propublica and Chicago Tribune
by Christina Jewett, ProPublica, and Sam Roe
Nov. 11, 2009
Dr. Michael ReinsteinChanile Hayes came under Dr. Michael Reinstein’s care after suffering a nervous breakdown. Hayes went from 140 pounds to nearly 300 in two years after taking Seroquel, a drug that Reinstein was paid to promote by its manufacturer, AstraZeneca. Executives inside pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca faced a high-stakes dilemma. On one hand, Chicago psychiatrist Dr. Michael Reinstein was bringing the company a small fortune in sales and was conducting research that made one of its most promising drugs look spectacular. On the other, some worried that his research findings might be too good to be true.
In an e-mail, an AstraZeneca executive says Reinstein should get careful treatment because of his potential worth to the company.As Reinstein grew irritated with what he perceived as the company’s slights, a top executive outlined the scenario in an e-mail to colleagues. "If he is in fact worth half a billion dollars to (AstraZeneca)," the company’s U.S. sales chief wrote in 2001, "we need to put him in a different category." To avoid scaring Reinstein away, he said, the firm should answer "his every query and satisfy any of his quirky behaviors."
Putting aside its concerns, AstraZeneca would continue its relationship with Reinstein, paying him  $490,000 over a decade to travel the nation promoting its best-selling antipsychotic drug, Seroquel. In return, Reinstein provided the company a vast customer base: thousands of indigent, mentally ill residents in Chicago-area nursing homes. During this period, Reinstein also faced accusations that he overmedicated and neglected patients who took a variety of drugs. But his research and promotional work went on, including studies and presentations examining many of the antipsychotics he prescribed on his daily rounds.
The AstraZeneca payments, filed as exhibits in a federal lawsuit, highlight the extent to which a leading drug company helped sustain one of the busiest psychiatrists working in local nursing facilities. In an interview and in response to written questions, Reinstein said industry payments he has received for speeches and other engagements have had no bearing on his research results or patient care. He said he does not "accept any money from corporations to study their medications. This eliminates any possible conflicts of interest."
But he does receive money from the Uptown Research Institute, a for-profit business that conducts industry and federally funded studies on psychotropic drugs to help mentally ill patients. Reinstein’s office in Uptown is adjacent to the research institute, which is owned by John Sonnenberg, a clinical psychologist who describes Reinstein as "a mentor of mine" and "brilliant." Sonnenberg said drugmakers and others pay his institute to do research, and the group, in turn, pays Reinstein a consulting fee "under $2,000 a month" and has for many years…
This next clip about Reinstein’s use of Clozaril is much worse and should be read in toto [In Chicago’s Nursing Homes, a Psychiatrist Delivers High-Risk Meds, Cut-Rate Care]. There are plenty of other equally disturbing reports about Reinstein and Sonnenberg. Just google michael reinstein md. And in spite of Sonnenberg’s denials, this is clearly a shared enterprise with a fabricated separation to deflect conflict of interest charges. It’s kind of hard to see how John Sonnenberg can run a 52 site multinational clinical trial from a Chicago store-front, but this is the very Agency in charge of the Lurasidone D1050231 Trial that I’ve been discussing – the one that Drs. Meltzer and Potkin are so excited about.

Back to the Main Event:
So, looking back to the table of changes for the clinical trial of Latuda® [D1050231], it should make sense. John Sonnenberg and his Uptown Research Institute conducted the clinical trial for Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma. In 2009 Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma acquired Sepracor and created Sunovion in early 2010. In the meantime, Dr. Reinstein and Uptown Research were the focus of a lot of negative and embarrassing attention, being included in suits against AstraZeneca’s Seroquel. Here, I’m back to guessing again, but I suspect that Sunovion needed to sanitize D1050231 and distance themselves from Reinstein and Sonnenberg, so they brought in Quintiles to clean things up and help them with their FDA process and other things. So Dr. Herbert Y. Meltzer was not the Principal Investigator of the clinical trial like he said in the video. He was a Principle Investigator of the Vanderbilt site, one of fifty-two sites. The Study Principal Investigator was John Sonnenberg PhD operating out of that Chicago store-front next to and affiliated with a major dangerous pill mill operated by Dr. Michael Reinstein [that needs shutting down yesterday]. I doubt that anyone reading the article in the American Journal of Psychiatry pictured that store-front as the research facility behind the article [or Dr. Reinstein as a psychiatric consultant]…

Addendum: Perhaps you recall Dr. Reinstein’s Seroquel Pamphlet on Diabetes from long ago:

Thursday, December 1, 2011

AstraZeneca Seroquel - the continued marketing of death & mayhem for profit - what about the victims?



In the past couple of days many readers may have come across a couple of headlines news articles highlighting & confirming how little has really changed when it comes to the pharmaceutical criminal cartels marketing of poisons such as Seroquel for massive profits & horrifying results. Yet, the body count continues to rise, and still AstraZeneca & others go about the nasty business of running their dubious operations as if it was just simply "Business as Usual". Now we have dog & pony puppet show Senate hearings giving some mouth air time to the ongoing carnage where very little has been done, quite obviously far far to late...

As they say; read it and weep... no one is really talking or thinking about the victims; they are the forgotten throw away lives that just get buried somewhere underneath the headline pronouncements of meaningless big dollars fines and hollow accountability promise banter; it's always all about the money... that's the up side down and backwards sad real world reality of our government & failed enforcement bodies in America.
---------------------------------

Inspector Highlights Psych Drug Use Among Elderly

Published December 01, 2011
Associated Press

Government inspectors told lawmakers Wednesday that Medicare officials need to do more to stop doctors from prescribing powerful psychiatric drugs to nursing home patients with dementia, an unapproved practice that has flourished despite repeated government warnings.

So-called antipsychotic drugs are designed to help control hallucinations, delusions and other abnormal behavior in people suffering from schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, but they're also given to hundreds of thousands of elderly nursing home patients in the U.S. to pacify aggressive behavior related to dementia. Drugs like AstraZeneca's Seroquel and Eli Lilly's Zyprexa are known for their sedative effect, often putting patients to sleep.

But the drugs can also increase the risk of death in seniors, prompting the Food and Drug Administration to issue multiple warnings against prescribing the drugs for dementia. 

Antipsychotics raise blood sugar and cholesterol, often resulting in weight gain. An inspector for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services told the Senate Committee on Aging that the federal government's Medicare program should begin penalizing nursing homes that inappropriately prescribe antipsychotics, according to written testimony obtained by the Associated Press.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services provides health coverage to nearly 80 million senior, poor or disabled Americans.

HHS Inspector General Daniel Levinson proposed that Medicare force nursing homes to pay for drugs that are prescribed inappropriately, and potentially bar nursing homes that don't use antipsychotics appropriately from Medicare.

A report by Levinson's office issued in May found that 83 percent of Medicare claims for antipsychotics were for residents with dementia, the condition specifically warned against in the drugs' labeling. Fourteen percent of all nursing home residents, nearly 305,000 patients, were prescribed antipsychotics. The HHS Inspector General's office Medicare claims during a 2007 six month period.

Doctors are permitted to prescribe drugs for off-label uses, though it is illegal for drug companies to promote uses that haven't been cleared by the FDA. In recent years several pharmaceutical companies have paid huge fines to the Department of Justice in cases involving off-label marketing of antipsychotics.

In January 2009, Eli Lilly & Co. Inc. agreed to plead guilty and pay $1.4 billion for illegal promotion of Zyprexa, including marketing to nursing home doctors. The company told its sales representatives to use the slogan "5 at 5," to persuade doctors that giving 5 milligrams of the drug at 5 p.m. would make dementia patients sleep through the night.

AstraZeneca PLC has paid nearly $600 million in two separate settlements with federal and state prosecutors over alleged off-label promotion of its drug Seroquel.

further coverage here @ c-span

--------------------------------------

Why Are So Many Foster Care Children Taking Antipsychotics?


From TIME healthland
 
More than 8% of children in foster care have received antipsychotic medication, and just over one quarter of those in foster care who also receive disability benefits take these drugs, according to a recent study in the journal Pediatrics.


The question is why? Children in foster care have typically been neglected or abused — indeed, simply removing a young child from his or her parents, even abusive ones, is in itself traumatic — so, not surprisingly, kids in foster care are more likely to suffer from psychiatric and behavioral problems than those who have stable families. Previous data suggest that foster-care children are about twice as likely as those outside the system to receive psychiatric medications.

Whether these problems are leading to higher rates of antipsychotic use, however, is not clear. "I think we have clinicians facing some very challenging situations," says Susan dosReis, associate professor at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy and lead author of the study. "But we don't have information as to why the prescribers decided on these medications for [these particular] youths."

MORE: Drugging the Vulnerable: Atypical Antipsychotics in Children and the Elderly

The numbers suggest that the influence of pharmaceutical company marketing cannot be overlooked. Ninety-nine percent of youth receiving antipsychotic medications in the study were given atypical antipsychotics — the newer generation of these drugs, which are expensive and mostly unavailable in generic form and have been heavily advertised.

All of the major manufacturers of these drugs have been fined by the Food and Drug Administration for illegal marketing practices — in part, for marketing the drugs for unapproved use in children — with some convicted of criminal charges.

Eli Lilly, which manufactures the atypical antipsychotic Zyprexa, paid out $1.42 billion in 2009 — $615 million of that to settle criminal charges. The charges against Lilly involved selling Zyprexa to doctors for use in children, despite the fact that it was not approved for this age group.

Bristol Myers Squibb paid $515 million in 2007 to settle charges that it also illegally pushed its antipsychotic Abilify to child psychiatrists. Pfizer paid out $301 million in a similar case related to its drug Geodon. AstraZeneca paid out $520 million to settle charges over the drug Seroquel. In all of these cases, the drugs were sold for unapproved use in youth.

The new study by dosReis and colleagues included records of more than 600,000 children enrolled in Medicaid in 2003, including those in foster care, those receiving disability benefits for mental diagnoses, and those on the welfare program called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.

Overall, nearly 3% of all youth on Medicaid received at least one prescription for an antipsychotic medication that year, which is itself a high proportion, especially given that the main condition that antipsychotics are approved to treat —schizophrenia — is extremely rare in children. The rate of schizophrenia in children under 12 is an estimated 2 cases per 1 million children; it affects fewer than 1% of older teens. Antipsychotics are also approved to treat bipolar disorder, a diagnosis that is highly controversial in children. Some studies suggest that it affects 0.2% to 0.4 % of children, and up to 1% of adolescents.

And yet, between 1994 and 2003, rates of bipolar diagnoses in youth under 19 rose by a factor of more than 40, according to the National Institute on Mental Health. It seems unlikely to be a coincidence that this rise occurred during the period when atypical antipsychotics were being illegally marketed for children.

Indeed, most of the antipsychotics used in foster-care youth were for conditions that the drugs were not approved to treat. Fifty-three percent of prescriptions were written for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a condition that is ordinarily managed with drugs that have the opposite pharmacological effects as antipsychotics. The stimulant medications like Adderall and Ritalin, widely used for ADHD, tend to increase levels of dopamine, while antipsychotics tend to decrease it.

Moreover, 38% of youth in foster care and 34% of foster-care youth receiving disability benefits received simultaneous prescriptions for more than one atypical antipsychotic, for more than three months — a practice that the researchers said "has demonstrated greater adverse effects with only marginal benefits." Worryingly, black youth were 27% more likely to receive two or more antipsychotics than whites.

"Essentially, medications like antipsychotics can help with mood instability and aggressivity," says dosReis, explaining that the drugs are often used to treat symptoms rather than conditions. Very little research is available on medication use in children to guide these practices.

"One of the things I would like to see come out of this research is starting to think about monitoring and evaluating the quality of care [these children are receiving]. We're not supporting or condoning these practices. One extreme says that no one should get these medications, and that's as irrational as saying we should be using more," she says.

MORE: Study: Antipsychotics Show No Benefit for Treating Veterans' PTSD

The risks of long-term prescribing of atypical antipsychotics to children, whose brains are still developing, are not known. What is known, however, is that the drugs cause severe weight gain in children, and that taking more than one antipsychotic drug may double, even quintuple, the risk of diabetes in youth. In adults, the weight gain associated with use of just one antipsychotic medication increase the risk of diabetes two- to four-fold, which has serious deleterious consequences for long-term health.

Although children in foster care may be genetically and environmentally at higher risk for mental illness, the disproportionately widespread use of antipsychotics in this group is troubling. "This study confirms the need for developmentally and trauma-informed practices in the vulnerable foster-care population," says Dr. Bruce Perry, founder of the ChildTrauma Academy. "Misunderstanding the pervasive effects of abuse and neglect leads to the mislabeling of behavioral and emotional symptoms in these children and then to overmedication." (Full disclosure: Dr. Perry is my co-author on two books.)

"The frustrating reality is that there are many evidence-based non-pharmacological interventions that have proven effectiveness and have no adverse effects," Perry says. Sadly, however, no one is spending billions to push them.

-----------------------------------
Not enough evidence! Read this disturbing testimony before the Senate & Congress,

highlight:
  • Children in Foster care were prescribed mind altering drugs up to 4.7 more times than children not in care.
  • Thousands of children had received more than the recommended dose of mind altering drugs
  • Over 600 children in state care were on 5 or more mind altering drugs at any given time
  • 5,265 infants [under the age of 1] were prescribed mind altering drugs.





Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Hundreds of Soldiers & Vets Dying From AstraZeneca Antipsychotic--Seroquel

Hundreds of Soldiers & Vets Dying From Antipsychotic--Seroquel

From PR Newswire

Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD & Stan White (Father of Deceased Veteran, Andrew White) disclose the following:

EL CAJON, Calif., Nov. 7, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- As a neurologist who has discovered and described medical diseases, I (FAB) read the May 24, 2008, Charleston (WV) Gazette article "Vets taking Post Traumatic Stress Disorder drugs die in sleep," and opened and financed my own investigation into these unexplained deaths.

Andrew White, Eric Layne, Nicholas Endicott and Derek Johnson, all in their twenties, were four West Virginia veterans who died in their sleep in early 2008. There were no signs of suicide or of a multi-drug "overdose" leading to coma, as claimed by the Inspector General of the VA. All had been diagnosed "PTSD"—a psychological diagnosis, not a disease (physical abnormality) of the brain. All were on the same prescribed drug cocktail, Seroquel (antipsychotic), Paxil (antidepressant) and Klonopin (benzodiazepine) and all appeared "normal" when they went to sleep.

On February 7, 2008, Surgeon General Eric B. Schoomaker, had announced there had been "a series, a sequence of deaths" in the military suggesting this was "often a consequence of the use of multiple prescription and nonprescription medicines and alcohol."

However, the deaths of the 'Charleston Four' were probable sudden cardiac deaths (SCD), a sudden, pulseless condition leading to brain death in 4-5 minutes, a survival rate or 3-4%, and not allowing time for transfer to a hospital. Conversely, drug-overdose coma is protracted, allowing time for discovery, diagnosis, transport, treatment, and frequently--survival.

Antipsychotics and antidepressants alone or in combination, are known to cause SCD. Sicouri and Antzelevitch (2008) concluded: (1) "A number of antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs can increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death," (2)"Antipsychotics can increase cardiac risk even at low doses whereas antidepressants do it generally at high doses or in the setting of drug combinations."

On April 13, 2009, Baughman wrote the Office of the Surgeon General (OTSGWebPublisher@amedd.army.mil): "On February 7, 2008 the Surgeon General said there had been 'a series, a sequence of deaths.' Has the study of these deaths been published?"

On April 17, 2009 the Office of the Surgeon General responded, "The assessment is still pending and has not been released yet." More than a year later and still no explanation, nor further acknowledgement that these deaths even took place.

In a press release, (PRNewswire, May 19, 2009) Baughman wrote: "I call upon the military for an immediate embargo of all antipsychotics and antidepressants until there has been a complete, wholly public, clarification of the extent and causes of this epidemic of probable sudden cardiac deaths."
Googling "dead in bed," "dead in barracks," by April 16, 2009, veteran's wife, Diane Vande Burgt, had Googled 74 probable sudden cardiac deaths.  By May 2010: 128, and, by November 2, 2011: 247.  Two-hundred-forty-seven!

In April 2010 I was in anonymous receipt of an Army National Guard Serious Incident Report for the 5 months 10/03/09 to 3/7/10. In it were 93 "incidents" including 4 "heart attacks," 6 "cardiac arrests" and 3 "found dead"; 13 of 93 (14%) probable SCDs.

Pfc. Ryan Alderman, was on a cocktail of psych drugs when found unresponsive, dying in his barracks at Ft. Carson, Colo. Sudden cardiac death was confirmed by an ECG done at the scene. Inexplicably, military officials de-classified his death and reversed the cause, calling it instead, a "suicide."

Again I challenge the military to produce the evidence.


In June 2011, a DoD Health Advisory Group backed a highly questionable policy of "polypharmacy" asserting: "…multiple psychotropic meds may be appropriate in select individuals." The fact of the matter is that psychotropic drug polypharmacy is never safe, scientific, or medically justifiable. What it is a means of (1) maximizing profit, and (2) making it difficult to impossible to blame adverse effects on any one drug.

From 2001 to the present, US Central Command has given deploying troops 180 day supplies of prescription psychotropic drugs—Seroquel included.  In a May 2010 report of its Pain Management Task Force, the Army endorsed Seroquel in 25- or 50-milligram doses as a 'sleep aid.'

Over the past decade, $717 million was spent for Risperdal and $846 million for Seroquel, for a mind-blowing total of $1.5 billion when neither Risperdal nor Seroquel have been proven safe or effective for PTSD or sleep disorders.


Ironically, yet not surprisingly, pay-to-play in Washington becomes more egregious every day. Heather Bresch, daughter of U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, (D-WV) was recently named CEO of WV drug-maker Mylan Inc., that recently contracted with the DoD for over 20 million doses of Seroquel.
Defense Department Health Advisory Group chair, Charles Fogelman, warned: "DoD currently lacks a unified pharmacy database that reflects medication use across pre-deployment, deployment and post-deployment settings." In essence, through a premeditated lack of record keeping, mandated by law at any other pharmacy or medical office to track potential fatal reactions to mixing prescription drugs, the military is willfully preempting all investigations into the injuries and deaths due to psychiatric drugs.

I call on the DoD, VA, House and Senate Armed Services and House and Senate Veterans Affairs Committees to tell concerned Americans and the families of fallen heroes what psychiatric drugs each of the deceased, both combat and non-combat, soldiers and veterans were on?

It is time for the military and government to come clean.

SOURCE Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD

Friday, October 28, 2011

AstraZeneca Seroquel - crime wave continues - It's just business as usual



AstraZeneca is at it again, as has been suspected and predicted for decades now....the profitable business as usual model of running a criminal enterprise without accountability or consequences has been encouraged by our government & continues unabated. Remember those DOJ "get out of jail free" slap on the wrist fines, the supposed CIA (Corporate Integrity Agreement), and the ongoing laughable & unjust Seroquel civil litigation....nothing has changed; It's still always profits before public health, profits before law, profits before anything....As AstraZeneca is bragging in their quarterly stock holder statement about how profitable they are....there is always the following types of criminal behaviors going on in the background...how does anyone negotiate a reasonable settlement with these documented serial criminals...You might start to wonder how far & deep this profitable crime wave runs?
....and now on to the latest episode of "Corporate Criminals Without Borders"

Financial Times Reports - AstraZeneca indicted in Serbian corruption case

October 27, 2011 10:46 am

AstraZeneca indicted in Serbian corruption case

AstraZeneca has been served with a criminal indictment by the Serbian authorities as part of a widening probe into alleged bribery by several pharmaceutical companies in the Balkan country.
The Anglo-Swedish drug group said it had filed legal objections with the courts requesting them to drop the actions since receiving the indictment in August, which relates to “allegedly improper payments to physicians.”

The action follows the arrests last year in Belgrade of senior officials at the Serbian Institute for Oncology and Radiology, as well as the heads of the Belgrade offices of AstraZeneca, Roche, Actavis, Sanofi-Aventis and PharmaSwiss, concerning payments of around €550,000 during 2007-09.
It comes as US and UK authorities are stepping up scrutiny of alleged corruption beyond their own borders, which has already led to a $70m settlement reached with Johnson & Johnson earlier this year concerning misconduct in Greece, Romania and Poland.

The news came as AstraZeneca posted third-quarter results in line with expectations while unveiling a higher, narrower 2011 core earnings per share target of between $7.20 and $7.40 per share. The company cited favourable exchange-rate movements and fewer shares outstanding following recent buy-backs as part of the reason for the increase.

In fresh disclosures on litigation, it also said it received earlier this month a subpoena from the US Department of Justice “in connection with an investigation of the possible submission of false or otherwise improper pricing information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.”

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Pentagon Refuses to Stop Using Anti-Psychotic Seroquel on Troops for Insomnia Despite Expert Warnings

photo credit & a good article worth reading link to - how the hell should i know blog
If there was not already enough evidence of the corruption involved in the marketing and use of the dangerous anti-psychotic drug Seroquel off label as a sleep aid...we only need to look no further than the Pentagon & our government...and we have to wonder why the DOJ gave AstraZeneca a "get out of jail free card" over their well documented illegal activities and crimes...??

_________________________________


From the AllGov web site

Pentagon Refuses to Stop Using Seroquel on Troops Despite Expert Warnings

Friday, September 30, 2011
Pentagon Refuses to Stop Using Seroquel on Troops Despite Expert Warnings
The U.S military is refusing to stop prescribing Seroquel, a powerful antipsychotic, to treat insomnia in troops fighting overseas, even though a panel of experts has recommended it do so.
 
Medical officials in the Department of Defense have approved low doses (25 milligrams) of the drug to treat sleep disorders.
 
Seroquel has been linked to adverse effects, including heart failure.
 
Several months ago, the Defense Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee noted that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved any drugs in the class known as atypical antipsychotics, which includes Seroquel, for treatment of insomnia. The committee also has urged the military to use less dangerous drugs to treat insomnia.
 
Additionally, the Defense Health Board, a federal advisory group that advises the secretary of defense, recommended in August that the Pentagon review its current guidelines on the use of non-FDA-approved drugs, including Seroquel.
 
Seroquel (quetiapine fumarate) has proved so profitable for its manufacturer, AstraZeneca, that over the last two years the company has paid more than $600 million to settle accusations of unlawful marketing and hiding side effects and safety information related to the drug.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 
Doctors Alarmed by Military’s Use of Mind Drugs on Troops (by David Wallechinsky, AllGov)